When Training Becomes Another Source Of Stress

When Training Becomes Another Source Of Stress

Author: Nick Pelios

There is something wonderfully contradictory about a freediver becoming stressed because they cannot relax. You arrive at the dive site, put on your wetsuit, prepare your equipment and spend several minutes trying to calm your mind before entering the water. You've probably travelled a considerable distance to be there, taken time away from work and arranged your schedule around the opportunity to train. The conditions are good, the safety team is ready and everything appears to be going according to plan. Yet instead of enjoying the experience, you're thinking about the depth you reached last week, the equalization problem you've been having or the personal best you were hoping to achieve today. You haven't even started your dive, and already you're disappointed by something that hasn't happened.

Freediving is unusual because relaxation is not simply a pleasant side effect of the activity. It's an important part of how we perform it. Unnecessary muscular tension increases effort, poor breathing habits can interfere with preparation and excessive mental distraction can make technical execution more difficult. We spend considerable time developing the ability to remain composed, move efficiently and respond appropriately to the sensations we experience underwater. Yet the more seriously people begin taking their training, the easier it can become to introduce psychological pressure into the very activity that requires them to manage it.

Most people don't begin freediving with particularly complicated expectations. They're curious about the underwater world, interested in learning something new or attracted by the unusual experience of moving through water on a single breath. During their first course, even relatively simple achievements can feel extraordinary. A comfortable duck dive, a successful equalization or the first controlled descent along a line provides genuine satisfaction. The numbers are usually secondary because almost everything is new.

Then progress begins, and progress is addictive in its own way. The first ten metres become fifteen, then twenty, and suddenly the diver begins wondering what thirty might feel like. They become familiar with training techniques, start following experienced athletes and develop a better understanding of what's possible. They buy equipment, plan training trips and set objectives that would have seemed unrealistic a few months earlier. There is nothing wrong with any of this. Developing competence is one of the most rewarding aspects of freediving, and structured training can provide a clear sense of direction.

The difficulty begins when improvement becomes the primary measure of whether a dive was worthwhile.

Imagine somebody who has been working toward forty metres. They've spent weeks preparing, and during their previous session they reached thirty-eight with good technique and reasonable comfort. Today they arrive expecting to go further, but something feels different. Equalization requires more attention, relaxation doesn't come as easily and the first few dives feel less comfortable than anticipated. They decide not to attempt the target depth, which may be exactly the right decision. Yet instead of recognising that they responded appropriately to the conditions and their own readiness, they spend the afternoon feeling that the session was a failure.

Nothing particularly bad happened. They trained, made sensible decisions and returned safely. But because the number on the dive computer didn't improve, the experience has been classified as disappointing.

This is where performance expectations can begin changing someone's relationship with the sport. The ocean is no longer simply somewhere they enjoy spending time. It becomes a place where they are expected to demonstrate progress. Every session carries the possibility of success or failure, and the distinction increasingly depends on whether they achieve something measurable.

Of course, competitive freedivers need performance objectives. Training for a competition requires planning, evaluation and the ability to work toward specific outcomes. But even outside competition, recreational divers can begin treating every session as though it were an examination. They compare themselves with friends, analyse previous performances and arrive at the water with a mental checklist of things they believe they should accomplish.

The irony is that the pressure they create may interfere with the qualities they are trying to develop. When attention becomes dominated by expectations, it can be harder to remain focused on technique, comfort and appropriate decision-making. A diver who is preoccupied with reaching a particular depth may become frustrated by normal variations in performance, even though those variations are part of training.

Freediving was never supposed to provide a daily demonstration of personal worth. It is a skill-based sport that requires patience, consistency and respect for conditions that are not always under our control. Sometimes the most productive session is the one where you accomplish less than you expected but understand more about why.

Unfortunately, that isn't always easy to appreciate when everybody around you seems to be getting deeper.







When Progress Becomes An Expectation





One of the most misleading things about learning a new skill is how quickly improvement can happen at the beginning. A freediver who has never received formal instruction may make substantial progress during their first few courses simply by learning effective equalization, improving body position and eliminating unnecessary movement. What initially felt difficult becomes manageable, and every training session seems to produce another small breakthrough.

It's an exciting period, but it can also create unrealistic expectations about how improvement works.

Eventually, progress becomes less predictable. The techniques that produced rapid improvements during the first months may no longer be sufficient. The diver needs more precise control, better awareness and greater consistency. Small technical problems that were previously insignificant become more noticeable, while progress may depend on details that require considerable time to develop.

Equalization is a particularly good example. Someone may progress comfortably until reaching a depth where their existing technique becomes less reliable. They might understand what they need to do intellectually but struggle to reproduce it consistently in the water. One day everything works beautifully. The next day, despite apparently identical preparation, the same movement feels difficult.

This inconsistency can be enormously frustrating, particularly for people who are accustomed to solving problems through effort.

In many areas of life, working harder is considered the obvious response to difficulty. If you're struggling with a project, you spend more time on it. If you're preparing for an examination, you study longer. If you're training for a running race, increasing your workload may sometimes contribute to improvement, provided recovery and progression are managed appropriately.

Freediving doesn't always respond well to that mentality. Some technical problems require a reduction in effort rather than an increase. Equalization difficulties may call for more controlled practice, a different progression or an assessment of the technique rather than repeated attempts to reach the same depth. A diver who feels unusually uncomfortable may benefit more from ending the session than from trying to prove they can overcome the sensation.

This is difficult to accept when the person believes that determination should always produce results.

There is also a psychological difference between wanting to reach a particular depth and believing you should already be capable of reaching it. The first can provide useful motivation. The second creates an expectation against which every session is judged. Once a diver has reached a certain depth, they may begin treating it as a permanent ability that should be available whenever they enter the water.

But a personal best is a record of what happened on one occasion. It isn't a guarantee of what will happen tomorrow.

Performance can vary with sleep, fatigue, stress, water conditions, technique and numerous other factors. Even highly experienced athletes have sessions when things don't feel right. The fact that somebody reached fifty metres last month doesn't mean that every subsequent dive to forty-five should feel effortless. And it certainly doesn't mean they should attempt to reproduce a previous performance when current conditions or readiness suggest otherwise.

Unfortunately, social comparison makes this harder. Freediving communities are often supportive, but they also bring together people with very different backgrounds, abilities and rates of progression. Someone who has been training for two years may find themselves alongside a diver who reaches similar depths after only a few months. Another person may appear to have effortless equalization, while somebody else spends an entire season working through technical difficulties.

These comparisons can become especially uncomfortable because freediving performance is so easily represented by a single number. Depth is visible, measurable and simple to communicate. The patience required to develop a reliable technique, the quality of someone's safety awareness or the ability to recognise when a dive should be abandoned are much harder to express in a social media caption.

As a result, divers can begin comparing the most visible parts of their performance while overlooking the qualities that contribute to long-term development.

An instructor may see substantial progress in somebody's technique, efficiency or judgement, while the diver sees only that their maximum depth hasn't changed. Both observations can be true, but they tell very different stories about the training session.

This is one reason coaching matters. A good instructor doesn't simply encourage somebody to go deeper. They help the diver understand what they're doing, recognise meaningful improvements and distinguish productive challenges from unnecessary pressure. Sometimes that involves setting ambitious goals. Sometimes it involves explaining why a session that produced no new personal best was still valuable.

And occasionally, it involves reminding somebody that they're allowed to enjoy freediving without continually proving how good they are at it.







The Hidden Pressure Of Taking Freediving Seriously





As people become more involved in freediving, the sport can begin occupying a surprisingly large part of their lives. Training sessions need to be arranged, equipment maintained, travel organised and physical preparation fitted around work and family responsibilities. Some divers add pool training, strength work, mobility exercises and dry equalization practice. Others begin monitoring sleep, nutrition and recovery in an attempt to improve their performance.

Individually, these habits can be useful. Together, however, they can create an increasingly demanding routine, particularly for somebody who is not a professional athlete.

Imagine a recreational freediver with a full-time job who wants to improve their depth performance. They arrange two pool sessions each week, spend time on equalization exercises, visit the gym and travel to the coast whenever conditions allow. They also have professional responsibilities, relationships and the ordinary complications of everyday life. Initially, the training provides a welcome structure and a sense of purpose.

Then work becomes unusually demanding, a few sessions are missed and progress slows. Instead of adapting the programme, the diver begins feeling guilty about not doing enough. They worry that their skills are deteriorating, that other people are improving faster and that the money they've invested in equipment and courses is being wasted.

The activity that was supposed to provide an escape from daily pressure has become another source of it.

This isn't unique to freediving, but the sport has characteristics that can make the pressure particularly noticeable. Training opportunities are often limited by access to suitable water, weather conditions, safety arrangements and the availability of qualified supervision. Unlike running or going to the gym, depth training cannot simply be fitted into any convenient half-hour. It requires preparation, coordination and appropriate conditions.

When somebody has travelled several hours or spent considerable money to attend a training camp, they may feel that every session needs to count. A disappointing dive can seem especially frustrating because the opportunity feels limited. The temptation is to make up for lost progress, particularly when the diver knows they may not have another chance to train at depth for several weeks.

But the cost of a trip doesn't change what is safe or appropriate on a particular day.

This is an important distinction because performance pressure in freediving is not merely a matter of enjoyment. It can influence decisions in an environment where good judgement is essential. A diver who feels compelled to achieve a target may be less willing to accept an early turn, acknowledge an equalization problem or abandon a planned dive. Psychological pressure should never be allowed to override established safety procedures, and breath-hold discomfort is not something to be treated as a test of determination.

Training also becomes more complicated when people begin connecting their identity to their performance. Someone who describes themselves as a serious freediver may feel that they need to train a certain number of times each week or maintain a particular level of ability. Missing sessions becomes more than a scheduling inconvenience. It can feel like failing to live up to the person they believe they should be.

Social media can reinforce this feeling. We see athletes training in beautiful locations, posting personal bests and sharing carefully edited footage of apparently effortless dives. What we rarely see are the sessions cancelled because of poor conditions, the technical problems that took months to resolve or the ordinary periods when progress was slow.

This creates a distorted impression of what serious training looks like. The visible moments are often the exceptional ones, while the repetitive, frustrating and occasionally uneventful work remains largely invisible.

There is also the issue of recovery. Freedivers may understand intellectually that rest is important, yet struggle to accept it emotionally. Taking time away from training can feel uncomfortable when progress has become a major source of satisfaction. But physical adaptation and skill development don't occur simply because somebody accumulates more sessions. Training quality, recovery, appropriate progression and the ability to maintain motivation over time all matter.

And there is a difference between being committed to freediving and allowing freediving to dominate every decision.

A person can take the sport seriously without making every holiday a training camp. They can pursue performance goals without measuring their self-worth through depth. They can miss a session because life requires their attention without treating it as a personal failure.

Perhaps the most useful question is not whether somebody is training hard enough, but whether their training is improving their life in the way they originally hoped it would.

Because if freediving is making someone constantly anxious, guilty or dissatisfied, it may be worth examining what has changed.







Learning To Enjoy The Water Again





One of the more interesting things about experienced freedivers is that many eventually develop a different relationship with progress. After enough years in the sport, they've encountered periods of rapid improvement, frustrating plateaus, unexpected setbacks and days when nothing seemed to work. They've learned that performance is rarely linear and that attempting to force progress can be counterproductive.

They may still be ambitious, sometimes exceptionally so, but ambition becomes more useful when it is accompanied by perspective.

A productive training session doesn't always need to involve greater depth or longer breath-hold times. It might involve improving body position, refining equalization, becoming more consistent with a particular technique or recognising a problem earlier than before. Sometimes the most meaningful improvement is simply developing the judgement to turn earlier, stop a session or acknowledge that the conditions aren't suitable for the planned objective.

These achievements may not produce impressive numbers, but they contribute to the skills that make someone a more capable freediver.

This doesn't mean abandoning goals. Goals provide direction, and working toward something difficult can be enormously satisfying. The important distinction is between using a goal to guide training and allowing it to determine whether every experience is worthwhile.

A depth target can help structure a training programme, but it shouldn't become an obligation that must be fulfilled regardless of circumstances. A competition can provide motivation, but the result doesn't need to define someone's relationship with the sport. And a personal best should be understood as an achievement, not a new minimum standard that must be maintained indefinitely.

There is also value in occasionally returning to the kind of diving that attracted someone to freediving in the first place. Not every session needs to involve a line, a depth target or a detailed analysis of performance. Recreational exploration, underwater photography and relaxed dives within one's training and safety limits can remind people that the ocean offers experiences that have nothing to do with numbers.

For someone who has spent months concentrating on depth, a day exploring a familiar reef may feel surprisingly refreshing. There is no expectation of improvement, no specific performance to reproduce and no reason to compare the experience with what happened during the previous session. The objective is simply to enjoy being underwater, with the same attention to safety that any freediving activity requires.

This kind of variety can help preserve motivation, particularly during periods when technical progress is slow. It also reminds divers that their relationship with the sport doesn't need to depend entirely on one discipline or one measurable outcome.

Coaching can play an important role here too. Instructors should be interested not only in what their students achieve, but in how they experience the training process. A diver who appears technically capable but becomes increasingly anxious before every session may need a different approach from somebody who is progressing comfortably and enjoying the challenge.

That doesn't mean coaches should act as psychologists or attempt to diagnose mental health problems. It means recognising that motivation, expectations and emotional responses are relevant to learning. Good coaching involves listening, adapting the training process and creating an environment where students can communicate difficulties without feeling that they're disappointing anyone.

It also means being careful about the language used around performance. Celebrating personal bests is natural, but they shouldn't be the only achievements that receive recognition. A technically controlled dive, an appropriate early turn or an improvement in consistency can deserve just as much attention. When divers understand that good judgement is valued alongside performance, they may feel less pressure to prove themselves through depth alone.

There is a broader lesson here about the way we approach activities that matter to us. The more invested we become, the easier it is to forget that commitment and enjoyment are not opposites. You can work hard at something and still have fun. You can take training seriously without taking every disappointing session personally. You can care deeply about improving while accepting that improvement doesn't happen according to a schedule.

In fact, preserving that balance may be one of the reasons people remain involved in a sport for decades rather than burning out after a few intense years.

Freediving asks us to develop patience, awareness and the ability to respond intelligently to circumstances we cannot completely control. Those qualities are valuable underwater, but they're also useful when deciding how to approach training itself. Sometimes the appropriate response is to challenge ourselves. Sometimes it's to work patiently on a technical problem. And sometimes it's to recognise that today isn't the day to pursue a particular objective.

None of those decisions makes somebody less committed.

Perhaps the real problem begins when we forget that training is supposed to serve the person doing it, rather than the other way around. We become so focused on the next depth, the next competition or the next improvement that we lose sight of the experience that made us interested in freediving in the first place.

The ocean doesn't care what depth we reached last week. It doesn't know how many courses we've completed, how expensive our equipment is or whether somebody else is progressing faster. Those expectations exist entirely in our own minds.

And while ambition can take us to remarkable places, it shouldn't make us miserable along the way.

The next time a training session doesn't go as planned, perhaps the most useful question isn't why you failed to achieve your target. It might be whether you made good decisions, learned something valuable and still found a reason to enjoy being in the water.

Because becoming a better freediver should involve more than increasing the number on a dive computer.

It should also mean developing a relationship with the sport that you can enjoy for years to come.

Back to News

Featured Articles